The famous Sanaullah Amritsari and Mirza Ghulam Ahmad
The focus of this debate is to prove whether the document titled as the “The final decision” is a mubahala challenge (prayer duel) or merely a supplication. The document in itself does not, however, include any condition of a mubahala challenge. But Ahmadi missionaries insist this letter is part of the chain of “challenges” that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad had made to Maulvi Sanaullah Amritsari, which the Maulvi failed to accept throughout the lifetime of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad.
So, in short AMJ wants everyone to understand this document
in light of the following points:
1.
The document is not a standalone prayer, but it
is to be understood in terms of a mubahala challenge.
2.
While addressing this document, one must keep in
mind the cowardice of Maulvi Sanaullah in failing to accept any challenges.
Before we examine the document, there’s another aspect that
is crucial to this case. The fact that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad signed a court legislation over refraining from making death prophecies and prayer duels In 1899. So if this is, indeed, a prayer duel, then Mirza Ghulam Ahmad is guilty of breaching court order.
If your still wondering whether this was a prayer duel or
a prayer alone? The image below finally puts an end to this debate:
The Final Decision in Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's own writings:
Now, let’s examine the document “The Final Decision”:
The Last Decision with Mr. Maulvee Sanaaullaah
(Amratsaree)
In the Name of Allaah, the Most Beneficent, the Ever
Merciful
[Submitted] to Mr. Maulvee Sanaaullaah.
Salaam [peace] on whosoever follows the guidance. For a long
time, your periodical Ahl-e-Hadeeth has been continuing to brand me a liar and
a profligate. … If I am as much of a liar and a forger
[‘muftaree’, an impostor, one who makes a false accusation, an accusation
which, in this context, is to impute something to God] as you quite often refer
to me in your periodical, then I shall die during your lifetime. Because, I know that the life span of a corrupter [mischief-monger]
and a liar is not very long and, ultimately, he dies, unfulfilled, in
humiliation and despair, during the life of his enemies. And it is better that
he die so that he may not destroy the servants of God. And if I am not a liar
and a rogue, and am honored by God’s discourse and address, and am the Promised
Messiah, then I hope that by the Grace of God, according to the practice of
Allaah, you shall not escape the punishment [given] to liars.
Hence, [I declare that] if, during my lifetime, you are
not afflicted with such punishment as is not [possible] from human hands but is
entirely from God’s hand, for example, fatal diseases such as plague, cholera
etc., then I am not from God Almighty. This is not a
prophecy based on revelation [of any sort]. [Rather] just in terms of a
supplication I have desired a verdict from God Almighty. And I pray to
God: O my Master, the Observer, the Powerful, who is the Knowing, the
Omniscient, who is aware of the situation of my heart. If this claim of being
the Promised Messiah is just an imputation from my self and, in your view, I am
a mischief-monger and a liar and am engaged in making false imputations day and
night then, O my beloved Master, I humbly pray to You
to make me perish in the lifetime of Mr. Maulvee Sanaaullaah and make him and
his group happy by my death. Aameen. But O my Perfect and True God, if Maulvee Sanaaullaah is not true in the accusations that he
levels at me, then I humbly pray to You to perish him in my lifetime. But not
with human hands [but] rather by fatal diseases such as plague, cholera etc.
Except in the case that he openly repents, facing me and in the presence of my
Jama`at, from all those vile epithets and the verbal abuse that he considers
[his] official duty [and with which] he always inflicts pain on me.
Aameen, O Lord of
all the worlds, Aameen. … I see that Maulvee Sanaaullaah, by dint of these
calumnies, wants to destroy my organization [the Ahmadiyya Movement] and
dismantle that edifice which You made with Your own hands, O my Lord and O You
who have sent me. For this reason, I am beseeching You, holding on to Your
Holiness and Mercy: Provide a true verdict between me and Sanaaullaah and [as
to the one] who in Your view is in reality a mischief-monger and a liar, make
him depart from this world in the lifetime of the truthful one; alternatively,
afflict him with some extremely severe tribulation that is equivalent to death.
O my beloved Master, [please] do just as this [i.e., as supplicated]. Aameen
and again Aameen. [Arabic text of a portion of the verse Quraan 7:90: … O our
Lord, decide Thou between us and between our people with truth and Thou art the
Best of those who decide.]
At the end I request Maulvee Saahib to publish this
entire article in his periodical and write whatever [he] wants under it. Now
the decision is in God’s hands. The
writer: Servant of Allaah, The Eternal -- Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, the Promised
Messiah May God protect him and help him.
Date of writing: Monday, April 15, 1907 AD;
Rabee`-ul-Awwal 1325 AH. [MAJMOO`AH, v. 3, pp. 578-579]
The excerpt from Akhbar Badr 6 (34). 22 August 1907. P.
8. Col. 1 proves that this was solely a prayer supplicated by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad to
prove his "truthfulness".
The next excerpt from the then Newspaper Al-badr vol. 6 number 24 (dated 13 June 1907 page 2 column 1) presented is also further proof that the document was actually a prayer sought by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, apparently as his last resort to intimidate Maulvi Sanaullah Amritsaree:
"...ap ka registry shuda card murasla 3 June 1907 Hazrat Masih Maud ki khidmat ma pohncha. Jis ma aap na 4 April 1907 k akhbaar k hawala da kar kitab HaqeeqaTulWahi ka aik nuskha manga ha. Es k Jawab ma aap ko mutla kiya jata ha k aap ki taraf HaqeeqaTulWahi bhajnay ka irada wo es liya zahir kiya giya tah, jab k aap ko mubahila k wastay likha giya tah ta k mubahila sa pahlay aap kitab parh latay. Magar choon'k aap na badeen khayal k Hazrat Mirza Sahib na Quran o Hadees k bar'khalaf to karna he nahi, ao aik aise baat paish karian k kisi tarha ya piyala tal jaway, apnay wastay ta'ayun(تعیین) azaab ki khawaish zahir ki. Or bagahir es k mubahila sa inkar kar k apnay liya faraar ki aik rah nikali. Es wastay Masheat-a-Aazdi(Allah) na aap ko dusri rah sa pakhra. Or Hazart Hujjatullah(Mirza Qadiani) k qalb main aap k wastay aik dua ki tahreek kar k faisla ka or tareeq(which was in poster of 15th April 1907 of Mirza) akhtiyar kiya(which was making Dua agianst Mollana Sanah Ullah Amratsari RA). Es wastay muhaila k sath jo shuroot tah wo sab k sab bawaja na iqraar patay ho'ay mubahila k munsookh hoay, lihaza aap ki taraf kitab bhajnay ki zuroorat na rahi."
"Molvi sahib aap k liya b Khuda ki gharat karishma dikhlay ge, Sadiq ki dua qaza samjhiya jo seedha jigr k paar honay wala ha, Haan ya maloom nahi k kab aisa ho ga, lakin ya zuroori ha k aakhri fiasla zuroor ho. us waqt maloom ho ja'ay ga k Allah ta'ala kabhi pasand nahi karta k us k mamoroo ki zillat ho. main aap ko koi dhamki nahi daita bal'k sirf aap ko ya samjhanay ki khater k aap ka ya kahna k chon'k aap barhay sakht mukhalif silsa Aalia Ahmadiyya k hain or aap ki mukhalfat oroon tak asar karti ha, es liya chahiya k aap ka pahlay khatima ho, Ba-zroor pora ho ga magar jis tarha Khuda Ta'ala ko manzoor ha."(Al-Hukm number 14 vol. 12 page 6 first column dated 22 February 1908)
The next excerpt from the then Newspaper Al-badr vol. 6 number 24 (dated 13 June 1907 page 2 column 1) presented is also further proof that the document was actually a prayer sought by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, apparently as his last resort to intimidate Maulvi Sanaullah Amritsaree:
Mufti Sadiq Qadiani writes on 5th May 1907:
Naqala Khat Banaam Molvi Sana Ullah Sahib
Summary of the excerpt:
Maulvi Sanaullah Amritsaree writes a letter to MGA asking him to provide him a book. Mufti Sadiq replies (on behalf of MGA) saying that providing him (Maulvi Sanaullah Amritsaree) a book was conditional, i.e., if the Mubahila chellenge had taken place, but since he did not accept it, they are no longer obliged to provide him with MGA's book. But instead MGA has made a prayer against him invoking God to manifest a divine decision as an "alternative" to Mubahala Challenge.
In yet another excerpt, this same author writes to Maulvi Sanaullah warning him of a prayer's fulfillment that will soon afflict him most certainly by annihilating him in the lifetime of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad:
"Molvi sahib aap k liya b Khuda ki gharat karishma dikhlay ge, Sadiq ki dua qaza samjhiya jo seedha jigr k paar honay wala ha, Haan ya maloom nahi k kab aisa ho ga, lakin ya zuroori ha k aakhri fiasla zuroor ho. us waqt maloom ho ja'ay ga k Allah ta'ala kabhi pasand nahi karta k us k mamoroo ki zillat ho. main aap ko koi dhamki nahi daita bal'k sirf aap ko ya samjhanay ki khater k aap ka ya kahna k chon'k aap barhay sakht mukhalif silsa Aalia Ahmadiyya k hain or aap ki mukhalfat oroon tak asar karti ha, es liya chahiya k aap ka pahlay khatima ho, Ba-zroor pora ho ga magar jis tarha Khuda Ta'ala ko manzoor ha."(Al-Hukm number 14 vol. 12 page 6 first column dated 22 February 1908)
The result of the prayer:
·
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad died shortly according to his
own criteria and that which he cursed his opponents with
·
He died of a disease similar to Cholera (if not cholera itself)
·
Maulvi Sanaullah lived on for 40 years after MGA’s
death (as opposed to Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's position: "a liar does not have a long life").
·
He was reported to have died in a car accident.
·
At the time of MGA’s death, his last words were “I have developed epidemic cholera". (reference provided below)
The Final Decision in Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's own writings:
http://files.qern.org/qarchives/haneef/
Sanaullah never accepted the challenge therefore your whole story is made up
ReplyDelete"I cannot, therefore, dare to enter into such a contest. Your purpose is that if I should die before you, you will proclaim that as a proof of your righteousness and if you pass on before me (a good riddance), then who will go to your grave to call you to account? That is why you put forward such stupid proposals. I regret, however, that I dare not enter into such controversy and this lack of courage is a source of honor for me and is not a source of humiliation.
- Sanaullah Amritsari, Ilhamat Mirza
" I have not challenged you to a prayer duel, I have only declared my willingness to take an oath, but you call it a prayer duel, whereas a prayer duel involves the parties taking oaths in a contest against each other. I have declared my readiness to take an oath and have not issued a challenge to a prayer duel. Taking an unilateral oath is one thing and a prayer duel is quite another. "
- Sanaullah Amritsari, Ahle hadith
Apparently, you only skimmed through this article for the sake of disagreeing. The article proves that this particular occasion on which Mirza Ghulam Ahmad supplicated to God, was in fact not a prayer duel, it was solely a SUPPLICATION to Allah to expose the liar by afflicting him with death before the death of the truthful one. So Mauvli Sanaullah's acceptance/rejection of previously issued challenges is irrelevant.
DeleteThe fact of the matter is MGA died 40 years before Maulvi Sanaullah.
Don't hide the miserable end of Sanaullah who died in despair and agony having witnessed the massacre of his one and only son with his eyes and his treasure house of books burning into ashes with people looting his house. Curse of God be upon the liars....Sanaullah & his followers who malign the Messiah of God would inevitably witness the absurdity of their heinous and contemptuous acts.
ReplyDeleteWho died in despair and agony? Most people die painful deaths despite being good human beings. Who says the manner in which one dies is the criteria to judge his character and piety by?
Delete(not to mention Maulvi Sanaullah died in a car accident, millions of such deaths occur)
His one and only died? Didn't several children of MGA die before his eyes as well? What irony.
His treasure of books burned into ashes? Wasn't MGA's hallmark of fame, the notoriously written 300 debates, upon which he championed the name of Ahmadiyya, get burned down as well? Those debates were never recovered and put out of record permanently. Isn't the irony so real here? Are you saying this transpired so that Ahmadis could witness the absurdity of their falsehood and deception?
Maulvi Abdul Majid Sohdarvi, biographer of Maulvi Sanaullah Sahib, writes in his book Seerati Sanai, published by Maqbool Aam Press, Lahore, that:
Delete"The moment he left his house, vagabonds and looters who were waiting for the opportunity swept in and took everything, including all the household items, cash and jewelry. After looting and robbing, they put the house on fire. That was, however, not the end of it; the looters also put on fire and turned to ashes Maulana’s most precious and valuable collection of books which included some very rare publications worth thousands of rupees and which he had brought together after great pains and expense. The loss of these books was no less distressing to Maulana than the loss of his only son. Those books were the most valuable estate of his life and some of them were so rare that it was not only difficult but impossible to replace them.
This violent grief remained with Maulana until his death and, in fact, these two tragic incidents were the major cause of his sudden death. The sudden loss of his only son and the burning of his most precious collection of books, and the affliction of both of these misfortunes over a short while claimed his life."
This is what Maulvi Abdul Majid had to say in Seerati Sanai. It is indeed a most distressful description and a remorseful end. Can the description of death by disappointment, misfortunes and frustrations be sketched in better words?
This is a total lie this was a mubahila (prayer duel) from him
DeletePrimarily, the mubahala challenge was given by Hazrat Mirza Sahibas in his book Anjami Atham, published in 1897 (Anjami Atham, Roohani Khazain, Vol. 11, .pp 45-72
Mirzaiyo, if you are true, then come and bring your Guru with you … bring him before me who has given me the mubahala challenge in `Anjami Atham’.
Delete(Akhbar Ahli Hadees, 29th March 1907).....this was the decision of amritsar after 10 years he accepted
Hey anonymous,can you establish that if sanaullah amritsari faced all this, it was only on account of Mirza, if any thing was to happen to him ,then it was the death within Mirza's life, and you know the truth of that
ReplyDeleteBy the way upon your line of reasoning can I postulate, the miseries of Ahmedi people (as they suffer in Pakistan) is because, they believe in a false prophet
Thank You and I have a nifty provide: House Renovation What Order small home renovations
ReplyDelete